360 Shoot Experience
I think the 360 experience was a little bit of trial and error.
My group went first. We practiced a few times with our idea, but then ended up making two takes. Although we had done two takes, it still wasn't as polished as the second idea was. Some things work well for the 360 shoot and some things don't.
Our idea, which was about a split world where a killer and a romcom boy fall in love, wasn't as polished because it was hard to account for how it would all come together around the camera.
I liked the second project better in my opinion because the video idea worked better with the 360 shoot - the cues were also easier to work with.
Trial and error helps a lot.
I feel like if I worked with 360 shoot now, I'd have a better idea of what films/plots could work with it. I also feel like it would simply take less time to set up since I've experienced it a couple of times.
It was fun all in all and I am fascinated by 360 googles. I'm still floored after watching it the first time in class because it is phenomenal.
Monday, March 27, 2017
Rough Theatre
Peter Brook brings up some lovely points in his writing about the "Rough Theatre."
There are certain feelings and atmospheres that cannot be recreated - it is often a feeling that no matter how it is strived for, cannot be artificially made.
Think, for example, of small mom and pop shops, of kitschy little thrift stores and restaurants along the boulevard - they are all unique places. They aren't chains, aren't recreated constantly. They are completely their own. It's beautiful in a way.
My rough theatre probably originated when I was younger. I used to have a cassette video recorder and I would make small movies with my toys. It was a big production and I used to even come up with stories with my cousin. It was fun - very obviously n o t good, but fun to make. Even more fun to watch back and laugh at.
Rough theatre is anything that people pour their blood and sweat and tears into that isn't careful and clean, I think. Film, places, stories... just depends on the medium as to how it is done.
Peter Brook brings up some lovely points in his writing about the "Rough Theatre."
There are certain feelings and atmospheres that cannot be recreated - it is often a feeling that no matter how it is strived for, cannot be artificially made.
Think, for example, of small mom and pop shops, of kitschy little thrift stores and restaurants along the boulevard - they are all unique places. They aren't chains, aren't recreated constantly. They are completely their own. It's beautiful in a way.
My rough theatre probably originated when I was younger. I used to have a cassette video recorder and I would make small movies with my toys. It was a big production and I used to even come up with stories with my cousin. It was fun - very obviously n o t good, but fun to make. Even more fun to watch back and laugh at.
Rough theatre is anything that people pour their blood and sweat and tears into that isn't careful and clean, I think. Film, places, stories... just depends on the medium as to how it is done.
Monday, March 13, 2017
16 MM Experience
I really enjoyed working with the film. It was a unique experience that I don't think I really would have been able to get anywhere else. However, it was a lot of frames to work on. I found myself struggling to sit down and work on it for long periods of time outside of the class.
I did have my idea of what I wanted to do for my part clear, though. I did my animation with the flowers, but I also worked on the fire section. I used tape and photos of fire for that. Though the tape stuck, I still feel as if I used the wrong kind of tape as it fell off after the film was projected.
As for how I worked with my partner, I felt like we worked well together! We both made time to meet outside of class and plan as well as work on the film. It was a good experience over all and my favorite part was seeing it projected.
There's a certain satisfaction that comes with seeing a work be realized.
Monday, February 13, 2017
Regards to Sound and Time as well as Acoustic Ecology
Firstly, I'd like to say that I loved Justin Boyd's Sound and Time. I tend to want to have snippets of moments all the time - recently I purchased an instant film camera just for the fact that it's more tangible than something electronic. It's still a record of the moment, but it reminded me quite a lot of when he sat down in front of the disk player. I like to have proof that things happened, to be able to have them - whether digital or physical - for me to look back on later. I know not all people do, but I feel like there's a good balance between documenting a moment and living in a moment that can be reached.
The actual film was gorgeous, too, and the sounds were so fascinating. I loved the bucket and the bell noises.
However, I'm not sure how I feel about the Listen film. I understand where he is coming from to a degree, but at the same time... Personally I like noises. I like having background sound whenever I do things. Music, TV, computer... I almost always have something running. I like nature sounds, but when it's very quiet and still I find myself uncomfortable. I almost feel as if I'm not supposed to be there. So I'm not quite ready to decrease the amount of sounds in my life. I'm pretty happy with them as they are now.
In regards to the two acoustic ecology articles - I think that it is true that humans need to be a little more conscious of how our actions impact the environment. Whether it be the fact that engines are almost a constant background noise, or the fact that plastic is filling the oceans, or any other number of pollutants, in general humans need to be more conscious. Granted, I do not know how. I'm not sure how to even begin approaching the acoustic ecology problem, but I do understand where people are coming from. I'd like to note that city sounds can be beautiful, though, just as nature is beautiful though in different ways.
(The fact that they are trying to copyright a motorcycle's engine sound doesn't surprise me.)
Saturday, February 4, 2017
Monday, January 30, 2017
Crowdsourcing
I think it is interesting to note that Wikipedia can almost be seen a microtask platform. Many people are adding and changing all the time. The Ted Talk by Jimmy Wales said Wikipedia sees an average of 1.4 billion page views monthly. That's a lot of traffic on one website, but also increases chances for addition when there needs to be.
Aaron Koblin made an interesting point in his Ted Talk as well. He claimed that with the interfaces we have now, we have an obligation to maintain humanity and tell some amazing stories. I think it was the most poignant part of his Ted Talk and I enjoyed it immensely. One of my favorite things to watch are projects about humanity, glimpses into it. Facebook has this wonderful page called Humans of New York where photographs and snippets from conversations with the people in the photographs are posted. I think it's a wonderful way to document humanity. It can be found here: Humans of New York.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
